Between 2018 and 2025, the Port Authority will rip out and restore the 1931-era, 7 foot paths on the George Washington Bridge as part of a $1.9 billion restoration.
The GWB is the sole bike-able connector between North Jersey and NYC. Its paths are already dangerously overcrowded at 3700 cyclists per day, on weekends, and growing 10.4% per year between 2010 and 2015.
If not widened to comply with national standards, the GWB will degrade to a “walk-your-bikes” facility, hobbling the growth of cycling across the region for decades, costing durable enhancements to tourism, public health, resilience and sustainability annually worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
George Washington BridgeCurrent GWB. (1) 7′ path for pedestrians, runners and cyclists. Photo by Hassan Diop.
- In 2015, NYCDOT recorded that the GWB averaged 3700 trips per day on weekends, making it the #3 most heavily biked bridge in NYC.
- Also, the fastest growing at 10.4% per year.
- Yet at 7 foot across, the GWB would have by far the narrowest path.
- For comparison, bike trips across NYC grew 12.5% per year from 2010-2015.
- At 521 users per hour, travel across the GWB paths well exceeds AASHTO‘s 300 User Per Hour threshold for widening to 14 foot.
- Remarkably, this level of growth has been achieved on a facility with an FHWA level of service grade of “F – Failing“.
Recent proposals by Bergen and NYC will dramatically expand cycling across region. They will also hasten the GWB’s obsolescence as a cycling facility.
Port Authority’s ADA-compliant planPort Authority’s Plan: (1) 7′ path for peds-runners. (1) 7′ path for cyclists. 11′ high anti-suicide barrier. Rendering by Amman & Whitney.
The Port Authority’s plan for the GWB paths chiefly comprises:
- Replace the stairs on the North Path with ramps.
- Widen the NY-NJ approaches.
- Restore paths as ADA-compliant, 7 foot pedestrian paths
- Assign one path to peds-runners and another to bicyclists.
Unfortunately, PA’s plan won’t improve the GWB’s current level of service.
- Peds-runners comprise just 25% of current peak use.
- 5-10% of pedestrians and runners will still use the bike path.
- Will not offset projected increase in bike travel through 2025.
- Melt-refreeze of snow accumulation will continue to restrict winter access.
- Safety barriers will block views of NY-NJ waterfronts and the Palisades.
- ADA won’t insulate the PA from liability in accidents involving cyclists.
- FHWA grade for the PA’s plan will remain “F – Failing”.
As an example of a facility compliant with national standards (AASHTO), the Complete George proposal would comprise:
- Four paths totaling 33.5′ for pedestrians, runners and cyclists.
- No cables to intrude on bike paths. They can be snowplowed to full width
- 9′ high anti-suicide barrier with an unobstructed views for peds-runners.
- A widened North Path would add meaningful capacity as soon as 2021.
- Compliance with AASHTO 2012 guidelines insulates the PA from liability.
- FHWA grade in 2024 is “A – Excellent“.
New York City has 828,000 adult cyclists and no recreational facilities not shared with pedestrians and represent a captive market for regional cycle tourism – North Jersey, Low-Mid Hudson Valley, Long Island and Connecticut.
Between the Mario M. Cuomo Bridge and the 750 mile Empire State Trail, New York will spend $500 million to grow cycling in the Low-Mid Hudson Valley. The GWB connects the two most heavily biked roads in the country, Hudson Greenway and Route 9W.
With the completion of the Mario M. Cuomo, the GWB would form a forty mile loop drawing cyclists from across the region. But cycle tourism could well decline if the single bikeable Hudson crossing out of NYC ceased to function as a cycling facility.
In economic terms, using Walkway Over the Hudson model, a linear park across the GWB with unobstructed views of Manhattan and the Palisades would annually attract 290,000 out-of-area visitors, spending $42 million and sustaining 675 jobs.
Bolstering the concept of the George as a great public space are original design drawings showing 16 foot wide paths and use projections indicate faster growth of foot travel than by car.
Doctors from the Columbia School of Public Health have determined that expanding the GWB paths would be an incredibly cost effective public health intervention at $883 per quality adjusted life year (QALY), which is 14 times more cost effective than vaccinating kids against the flu.
Cycling across the GWB represents a significant increase in trans-Hudson capacity, one that meets the PA’s criteria for as a means to reduce bus traffic into Manhattan.
Should we lose the Hudson rail tunnels before their replacements can be built, wider paths would support 20,000 bike commuters per day. Cycling across East River bridges doubled to 30,000 per day after Superstorm Sandy. And bike use across the Williamsburg is expected to double to 14,000 when the L Train is shut down to repair the Canarsie Tubes.
If bike trips across the GWB were subsidized as the PA does low-emission vehicles ($2.75-$6.75 per trip), the annual CO2 offsets would be worth $5.8 million.
Key beneficiaries of widened GWB paths are working class, minority communities who’ve borne the brunt of bridge congestion, unsafe streets and degraded air quality for generations.
The PA would then align itself with cities like Baltimore, and Los Angeles which will spend $4 billion over 40 years to extend cycling infrastructure to its “transit deserts.” The expansion of the San Franciso-Oakland Bay Bridge provides a critical waterway link where no other option exists.
A widened GWB would draw bike share up to Washington Heights, motivate a grid across Bergen and resuscitate dormant projects like Hudson Valley Greenway through the Bronx and River Road Corridor through Edgewater.
Hudson Valley Greenway. Source RBA.
River Road Corridor in Edgewater. Source RBA and Louis Berger Group.
For New York to retain it ranking as World’s #1 Most Competitive City, it must attract and retain a millennial workforce, a demographic that favors bicycling over driving and mass transit.
London, the #2 MCC, is in the midst of a $1.4 billion build out of its bike grid. By 2019, they expect that 50% of all trips into the central business district will be by bike.
Dozens of national studies correlate increases in home prices to their proximity to bike paths, ranging from 4% in Delaware to 23% in Chicago.
Crediting NYC’s 1000 mile bike grid with a “Delaware” multiple, its current share of annual city property taxes would be $150 million.
If we accord the GWB another half a percent for connecting the city grid to recreational roads in Bergen-Rockland, the incremental revenue would be $15 million per year.
The European Cyclists’ Federation credits cycling with saving the E.U. $27.7 billion per year in reduced noise, emissions, gas use and health costs or $546 per person.
90% of Tokyo‘s 13 million residents use mass transit for their daily commute. Of those, 30% bike the first-and-last mile.
- $39 million – Walkway over the Hudson
- $55 million – Kosciusko Bridge (Newton Creek)
- $60 million – High Bridge
- $90 million – George Washington Bridge
- $135 million – Bayonne Bridge
- $135 million – Goethals Bridge
- $380 million – what USDOT deems reasonable to upgrade bike-ped access on GWB (20% of total $1.9 billion reconstruction)
- $300-400 million – Verrazano Bridge
- $440 million – Mario M. Cuomo Bridge (11% of $4 billion total)
The GWB will need to support more bike trips than all the others combined.
Savings from widening the GWB during recabling vs. later as a stand alone project:
- Historically low interest rates allow the PA to finance construction cheaply and without affecting their credit rating.
- Cantilevers for bikeway can support safety scaffolding during recabling.
- Proceeding now saves decades’ worth of Construction Cost Index increases.
Presuming 3% annual increase in the cost of construction, plus 2% inflation, the cost to widen the GWB paths grows from of $90 million in 2018 to $430 million in 2050.
- Cyclists want improvements made to GWB – News 12 New Jersey, 4/18
- GWB Reconstruction Misses the Mark, Regional Plan Association, 7/17
- GWB project: 7 years, $2 billion, and one thing missing, Crain’s, 2/17
- I’m back and things have only gotten worse, Bike Snob, 2/17
- Help make the GWB in NYC Better for Cyclists, The Radavist, 1/17
- (Foot) traffic problems on the GWB, Brian Lehrer Show, WNYC 12/16
240 organizations, businesses, communities and public officials have called on the PA to widen the GWB paths to comply with national standards as part of the upcoming reconstruction.
- “We would encourage the Port to continue to think aggressively about planning for adequate bike facilities in all of its projects. Specifically, about the long-term need for additional capacity on the George Washington crossing. – NYC Deputy Mayor, and former PANYNJ Executive Director, Anthony E. Shorris
- “As one of the densest metropolitan areas in America, we must commit to shore up 20th Century infrastructure that cannot keep up with the demands of the 21st Century.” – Eleven NY-NJ members of Congress
- “We ask (Gov. Cuomo) to call on the PA to widen the GWB paths as part of any state program to expand cycling infrastructure.” – Letter to Governor Cuomo signed by 15 NY State Senators and Assemblymembers
- “6,000 cyclists cross the GWB per weekend. This number will go up, not down.” – Orange County
- The closest Hudson River Crossing to CB4 which allows cycling is the GWB.” – Manhattan Community Board #4
- “The Borough has installed bike lanes, promoted bicycle safety and has served as the host community to bicycle races and similar functions. Widening the (GWB) paths would serve as a perfect compliment to improvements and policies that we, and neighboring communities, have implemented.” – Fort Lee, NJ
- Before construction begins, the (PA’s) plans must be revisited to ensure that this once-in-a-lifetime project is planned to optimum standards, not just good enough. – Transportation Alternatives
- “With new off-road opportunities opening up in Sterling Forest, Harriman State Park, paths that meet federal guidelines will insure that cyclists can commute to and from NYC with ease.” – International Mountain Bike Association (IMBA)
- “As a long-distance cycling club, we wholeheartedly support segregating the pedestrian walkways and widening the bicycling pathways of the GWB as part of the planned refurbishing of the span.” – Long Island Randonneurs
- “The plan to allocate one 7 foot path for peds-runners and another for cyclists will inevitably cause runners to move over to the cyclists’ path.” – NY Road Runners
- “Despite being the only bike route over the Hudson leaving NYC, the proposed 7-foot paths seem more like an afterthought than a true civic amenity.” – Regional Plan Association
Questions for the Port Authority
- If a 3700 cyclists per day is insufficient to warrant widening the paths now, then what is the PA’s threshold? How much more crowded does it need to get?
- If the PA regards the cost of widening the paths during recabling as too high, then what’s the likelihood that a standalone job, at far greater cost, will find acceptance later?
- With bike-share expanding up both sides of the Hudson, how will providers load-balance rush hours if bicyclists are allocated a single 7 foot path?
- If 240 organizations, businesses, communities and public officials aren’t enough of a constituency to get this project moving, then who is?
- How can the PA guarantee bicyclists continued access without the insulation from liability afforded by an AASHTO design.
Marine Parkway Bridge. (1) 6′ path for pedestrians. Photo by John T. Chiarella.